Hi all!
I came across two intriguing stories this week. One was an article and one was a video. They both talked about the future of our food culture and how we, the world, are going to support our exponentially enlarging population with a limited food supply. Both stories offered inspired approaches to this serious problem.
I came across two intriguing stories this week. One was an article and one was a video. They both talked about the future of our food culture and how we, the world, are going to support our exponentially enlarging population with a limited food supply. Both stories offered inspired approaches to this serious problem.

It seems obvious and simple to turn to the purest forms of essential nutrients that our bodies need. In Wall-E the 2008 Disney Pixar movie that depicted the earth's environmental demise also showed the obese people of the starship living off of "Lunch in a cup!" The alternate food source the people consumed sounds very much like Soylent.
![]() |
Bitty Logo |
So how do these alternate food sources help? I think the end goal of both companies is to take a large slice, if not the whole pie, away from the pizza of world hunger by sending their products to impoverished nations. Soylent could be used as a filling form of nourishment and become a staple in poorer county's food support system, while cricket flour can be substituted for other flours in foods such as bread, muffins, or even cookies!
So which would you prefer to be the future of our food? Both? Neither? I'd definitely like to try both!
More,
No comments:
Post a Comment